What Do You Think of the Clever Title, Your Friendly Nation-hood Poet?
Think it will raise my standing in the social media algorithms? The title: 'The American Press is No Longer Free: Here's 2 Years of Daily Proof' didn't.
Sunday, October 18, 2026
Good morning, The Wonder Fell Way. O/
A few hundred words every morning posted for free all over The Internet's most popular places to remind people what writing is really for.
A poet protecting the sanctity of the written word.
What do you think of the clever title, "You Friendly Nation-hood Poet'? Think it will get any readers? Think it will raise me in the high school popularity contest called the social media algorithms?
The Headline: The American Press is No Longer Free: Here's Two Years of Daily Proof, didn't.
The proof of the Headline is in its response: Zero clicks.
A democratic algorithm is an oxymoron. We have to be very careful how we use machines in a free country because the way a machine operates is the antithesis of free.
Trusting algorithms to sort and deliver our media (press) surrenders our freedom to a machine.
Corporate AI or monarch or dictator; any party other than a free citizen deciding what we get to watch and read makes our press not free.
America got blinded by the awe that a video game can search and rearrange The Internet. As a result we let our guard down and surrendered Our Press to machine rule. Your phone is now a pixel brick of confirmation bias. There's nothing new in your News.
Whose fault is that?
All of us.
We get more of what we've seen and not what's worth seeing. That's the disease that threatens America right now.
The cause and perpetuation of the illness that plagues The United States is in the algorithms controlling Our Press distribution.
So, is Your Friendly Nation-hood Poet a clever enough title to impress the high school social media metrics enough so at least one free American can see The News I share freely?
I took two years of being ignored on purpose every single day to use as evidence.
Two years. Everyday. New News worth reading, with time on all the major social media platforms, without a single click from a free American because I didn't cater to the algorithms.
Proof enough?
We shouldn't require a spectacle side-show to share press with each other. Right now, that's where I'm at. If I play by the established systems in place I have to do a song and dance to be able to share with you the proof that we've surrendered Our Press Freedom. That fact is further proof that we have.
I held off on going forward the old-fashioned way to prove the point that the old way of free citizen directly to free citizen is not only better, but a requirement for a free press.
Obviously I could reach out directly to people, but isn't that what everyone believes they're doing when they share on social media?
The reality is your words, from Presidents to Poets, Billionaires to Bums, only reach people a machine says you're worth reaching.
Does that sound like freedom to you?
It's the exact opposite of freedom.
But it's shiny new technology and isn't it helpful and fun?
~ Wynn ~
Brought to you by the emoji of the day: 🎤microphone





Archaic Slab: (Warranty Deed of Original Intelligence)